Blog

:: Terms:

Icontoclastic :: The functional attribution of accumulated wealth, into seperate categories and ideation, groupings.

Ator :: A, Type of, "Political // Social"-Agent

:: Terms:



The, Distinctions between factions leads to, Variability in the ideation of zone control, cultural mutation (ie, shared cultural values), the establishment of wealth, and, the differentiation of wealth circles, as predicated upon, by icontoclastic division and the seperatory function, of party associates curated within, and catored to by, distinct wealth circles.



Allowances, within tribes, allows for the formation of cultural, dependancy, and aMutational guidelines for inter faction, discrepancies, enumerance, the formation of distinct jurisdictions, and coalition.  Party guidelines can form for any number of reasons, from, food shortages too surpluses, trade dependancies, weapon advantages, verbose skill transmission among a portion of the population, the existence of prize resources in a certain area, genetic significance among a portional population and diasporas.



When, a population develops an operation guideline for cultural independance, a certain protocol emerges, which distinguishes it from neighboring communities.  The variability, of operation guidelines, follows suit, that an operation guideline, can emerge independantly, of pre-existing Guidelines, where, a guideline is said to be classified as, an Emergent guideline.  Additionally, a guideline, can sprout, from a pre-existing, guideline, where it is, said to be, Operationally Dependant.  If, a guideline sprouts from a pre-existing tree, but for organizational reasons creates it own tree, based off of 1) cultural distinction, ie, a mutated factor 2) a strong curtain in the cultural blueprint which sakes a given shift in the interactional dynamics of a cultural swarm, or 3) The association of, one, or more operational chains leads to, the, usefulness, of a separate chain.



Developed consternation, requires that we look at these operational guidelines as a, framework by which cultural dependancies, independancies and shared-mutations can occur, in the guise of chained or binary tree format.  The, host, of developmental differences which can develop, concern the basis, of jurisdictional dependance, and can devise laws with which, a culture, can leverage interactions, create the conditions, or provide, the basis for shared cultural mutations.  In, lamense; allowing, for the creation, of frameworks for cultural intervention.



The Operation Guideline Protocol, follows the following rules, and can, populate a tree as such.



A tree collection is owned, to a Culture, and each tree collection contains a set number of trees, which are connected by functional interdependancies.



An, instance in the tree contains some verifying factor, or informational quality which delineates some feature of a given culture, with respect to a number of other qualifying features.  Each, "Feature" connects logically with, the next in the formation of a binary chain.  Qualifying factors form the basis of cultural, interaction quidelines, and set the tone for cultural appropriation, misappropriation and justice as concerning the, two, afforementioned functions.



Each, tree can connect with, any, number of the other trees, with the inclusion of a combinatorial lock, which signifies some number of logical adjustments, and behavioral aggregations which form the basis for cultural imprudence.  A seperate, combinatorial lock is required for each, connection between trees.



Combinatorial, locks can have a number of strict interactional, requirements, rangeing from pattern shifting experiments to ellucidate values, useful interactional strings and dynamics in, a given cultural appropriation.  Correction algorithms, can be introduced later to, 1) Shift Behavioral patterns in respect to some, core fundemental aggregate or 2) Provide a basis, with which, behavior can be checked, for conformity.  Attenuators, can be used to Redistribute, the spoils of some task, game or attribution sum.  



Conformity, relations/relators, can be appropriated, based on, a string of numbers which allot a confined behavioral pattern as governed by, a shared Cultural Dictum, which gives meaning to the patterns attributed to, the singlteon appropriation, and the combined appropriation of, Tree/Chain lists. The " following laws, can be applied to such, implementations, of "Regularized Pattern Strings".  1)  Each, Chain has, a core "Numerical" value, with other values linked, to it, associated with Each entry, that defines "In Chain Functionality" and external behavior, when dealing with other chains.



2)  Regularized Pattern Lists serve the function of,  1) Aggregating Behavior into plots which are repeated, Acorroginally according, to imbeded logic, which shunts an ators attention around the list.  Accomplishing behaviors according, to Determinate Yields, Hartate occurences and Interaction, with different cultural forces.  2)  The definition of refined Cultural Behavior, Plots as associated with, different traits, and behaviors, that a culture might engage.  3)  A standard, action corregate plot which will serve to, enact a specified behavior.


:: Terms:

Icontoclastic: The functional attribution of accumulated wealth, into seperate categories and ideation, groupings.

Ator :: A, Type of, "Political // Social"-Agent

:: Terms:

Party, Occurence signifies, a great deal of Cultural Accruement, Compounded by a great deal, of outlying factors. The, majority of which are cultural in nature. This, might, be referred to as, “Cultural Agrandizement”, and for good, Reason, because as a wise sage once said, “Culture begets, Culture”.

Culture revolves, around, the foundation of, Social Benevolences which a Society directs, its Intellectual Attention to. Language, Mathematics, Style and Form.

The valuation, of Materials and Logic, designates a topic for Cultural Reventure, but trusting this Significance to anything but, Internal Social Structures would force, Reliance on Hartate means alone.

Hearty, Cultural, Trends and Belief require, Work and Rework, entitled to the Core values, of Which a Society, Rests it beliefs. Semperant Vitality, as applied to “Cultural Norms”, is the root of this seperate argument.
“Consternation”, is the applied use of these means, and Carries, the weighted Values with which a “Cultural Designation” Might be Applied.

So, Cultural, Belief, when Formalized can be considered a, varitable form of, Consternation; a guide point with which Cultural Norms are set.

Now, when we consider, “Cultural Proofs”, in whatever form they might be, formulated, we can attenuate that information, to Proffer a Variety of different scales, mathematical formulations, which we might Refer to as “Ideation Proofs”, and Differentiation Arguments that make up the basis of our “Cultural Appropriation Engine”, as would be applied, with the use of “Minimally Compounded Logic”. The Heuristics of such an Engine, could be anything, But the Particulars are up to you.

The Specific Application, of Compound Reventure as Applied to “Hartate Theory”, might be, The Bounds of Cultural Mixing, Attrifaction and Subversion After War and the Articulation and Blending, of any number of, Social Units with, a larger Body of Social Coalesence. Specifically, the means applied to Foment and Curb these factors.

Consider, a Group of Travelers; they may be Merchants, Sailers, Hunters, or a Diplomatic Party. Lets, say they are from a foreign land, and that, regardless of their Formal-Party-Intentions, they are in seek of “Rest, Revitalization, Refitture and Recompiture”, this Acronym meaning, Lodgings, Food, Restock and Sale of some measure. The Party, will most likely be required to Speek in some Foreign tongue, Translate currency value via a foreign metric, stay or articulate foreign norms and bely their Hartate Instincts to navigate safely, such, a foreign environment.

Such, a Party would need to, Modulate, their voice, Body Language, and the carriage of items they Keep in their Entail. During Celebrations this list might grow to include a Whole host of other items.

Cultural Revention Signifies, all Forms of Cultural Formalization and covers, the topics of Growth, Altercation, Subversion, Revitalization and Specific Attenuation, as Applied to Sub Cultures.

Cultural growth, and Solidification of new Norms usually occurs after some Peak of Cultural, Activity, and the bulk of which, occuring during, the cooling off, Period of such a Peak. Changes in a Cultures practices, and Growth as such, usually occurs in such cycles. These, Trends allow cultures to Solidify and Resolidify Norms, these norms determining what is Considered Culturally “Appropriate”, given a variety of Different Factors.

Party-Hartate Proceeds to Conflict, if Cultural Appropriation and Regulation Means Breakdown.

Conflict is represented by a Multi-Layer-Entraction Scheme.

Mediation is the First Normative Form of Conflict; and represents the, Only Culturally Valid-Form of the Entraction.

The second, normative form of conflict is Intimidation and Represents the Stalling, Stage of the Entraction.

Armed-Conflict, is the final stage of, Entraction, and Represents the Breakdown of Cultural Norms.

Allotment, as a Formal Argument has many forms, these based on Propriety, Neccesity, Luxury, Sacred Mass and Salutation. The, valuation of these, means, can be Appropriated, based on the Delineation of Trade and Tradition. Formal Recognition of these articles, validates these means according, to their usefulness as Cultural and Marketing, Ideation and Formulation methods.

Culture Party Proofs, delineate the “Tradition”, means, of “Usefulness”, “Cooperation” and “Satisfaction”, the propriety of these methods, argues, that there is a limit which all, Three Arguments must fullfill, however none of these, “Valuates” as such can overwhealm the total, category. “Usefulness”‘s, Antiparty-Volition is, “Derogation”, “Cooperations”, Anti-Party-Volition is “Idleness”, and “Satisfaction”‘s, Anti-Party-Volition, is “Waste”. A scale, is Fomented, when we compare, each of these Categories, to their, Coressponding Anti-Party Volition. If, for Whatever reason, the scale of these Arguments, Shifts towards its Anti-Party Volition, a Counter-Shift in the Associated, “Party Body” is Likely to Occur.

Trade Party Proofs, delineate, the Market, means, of “Funding”, “Entail” and “Consumption”. The, furtherance of these, proofs follows suit that, “Funding”, Facilitates the other two, has, an Anti-State of “Debt” and is, generally considered a Requirement, for Goods.

“Entail”, deals with how, goods Contribute, to “Means”, “Metric” and Other goods.

“Consumption”, is the process of use, as concerning, goods use, and Proffers the State of Furtherance, concerning Activity Appropriation, on the Scale of “Organismal-Reality”. “Consumption”, also has an Anti-State of “Waste”, also attributed to this, process, is the Clause-Anti-Clause Relation of “Satisfaction” and “Reduction”.

Party-Body volition is likely to Coohere to, Allogations and Dengregations of, Trade/Tradition, Arguements and is likely, to develop a “Dicota”, which states, the Preferred Appropriation-Schedules for Goods, Consumption. Variagation in, Goods Appropriation, Schedules Consolidates how, a Culture, Utilizes its Myriad goods, and Delineates the Structure of Compounding, Tradition Theology.